![]() Specifically, the court held that “the evidence considered by the trial court supports its conclusion that S.B. 824 violates the Equal Protection Clause of the North Carolina Constitution because it was enacted with “impermissible” racially discriminatory intent. In today’s 4-3 opinion, a majority of the North Carolina Supreme Court affirmed the trial court’s decision holding that S.B. The North Carolina Supreme Court accepted the petition and heard oral argument on Oct. Following this decision, the state and legislative defendants appealed this decision to the North Carolina Court of Appeals, but the plaintiffs then asked the North Carolina Supreme Court to take over the case before the appellate court heard the appeal in order to avoid a delay in the resolution of the lawsuit. ![]() 824 from being enforced, finding that it was passed with the intent, at least in part, to racially discriminate against African American voters in violation of the state constitution. 17, 2021, a three-judge panel of a state trial court permanently blocked S.B. 824 for violating the Equal Protection Clause of the North Carolina Constitution and arguing that it was passed with the intent to discriminate against African American voters. A majority of the court found that the “law was enacted with discriminatory intent to disproportionately disenfranchise and burden African-American voters in North Carolina.” This decision arose from a 2018 lawsuit brought by the Southern Coalition for Justice on behalf of individual voters challenging S.B. 16, the North Carolina Supreme Court issued a 4-3 opinion affirming a trial court’s decision to permanently block Senate Bill 824, a 2018 law that provides a narrow list of qualifying photo IDs acceptable for voting in the state.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |